the_firm
record_of_success
attorneys_paralegals
practice_areas
news
careers
contact





Appellate

One of the strengths of our firm is our strong appellate practice. Indeed, we are one of the few litigation firms of our size that maintains a full-time appellate department.

Our appellate attorneys are successful not only in preserving client's victories or obtaining justice when a company has been unsuccessful at trial, they are also invaluable in working with our trial lawyers on strategy as rulings are made throughout a case. Our appellate attorneys are held in such high regard that they are routinely asked to handle appeals of lawsuits litigated by other firms.


Our successfully reported appeals include:

Durham v. Forest Preserve District of Cook County , 152 Ill. App 3d 472, 509 N.E.2d 899 (1st Dist. 1986); In re: Anthony Mason 122 Ill. 2d 163, 522 N.E. 2d 1233 (1988); Reidy v. Knuepfer, et al., 1987 WL 18550 (N.D.Ill. 1987);  John Hicks v. Clyde Federal Savings & Loan , 696 F. Supp. 387 (N.D. Ill. 1988); Robert Tucker v. Patrick McNulty , 173 Ill. App. 3d 722, 527 N.E. 2d 953 (1st 1988 ); John Hicks v. Clyde Federal Savings & Loan , 772 F. Supp. 501 (N.D. Ill. 1989); Community Mental Health Council, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue of the State of Illinois , 186 Ill. App. 3d 73, 541 N.E. 2nd 1330 (1st Dist. 1989 ); Winston v. Board of Education , 182 Ill. App 3d 135,537 N. E. 2nd 964 (1989); Estate of Wrage v. Tracey , 191 Ill. App. 3d 117, 550 N.E.2d 1115 (1st Dist. 1990); Geraghty v. Continental Western Life Ins,. Co 281 Ill. App. 3d 669, 667 N.E. 2nd 510 (1st Dist. 1996); Cammon v. West Suburban Hospital Medical Center , 301 Ill. App. 3d 939, 704 N.E. 2d 731 (1st Dist. 1998);  Edward I. Stein v. Rio Parismina Lodge, et al., 296 Ill. App. 3d 520, 695 N.E. 2d 518 (1st Dist. 1998); Castro v. Brown’s Chicken and Pasta, Inc., 314 Ill. App. 3d 542, 732 N.E. 2d 37 (1st Dist. 2000 ); Ferguson v. Chicago Housing Authority , 155 f. Supp. 2d 913 (N.D. Ill. 2001); Garner v. City of Chicago , 319 Ill. App. 3d 255, 744 N.E.2d 867 (2001); McCorry v. Gooneratne ,  332 Ill. App. 3d 935,775N.E. 2d 591 ( 1st Dist. 2002); United States v. Serpico , 196 F. Supp. 2d 700 (N.D. 2002); Mearday v. City of Chicago , 196 F. Supp. 2d 700 ( N.D. Ill. 2002); Campania Management Co. v. Rooks, Pitts & Poust , 290 F.3d 843 (7th Cir. 2002); Coburn v. Daimler Chrysler Services of North America, LLC , 289 F. Supp. 2d 960 (N.D. Ill. 2003); Farmer v. Levenson , 2003 WL 22473862 (7th Cir. 2003); Mann v. Rowland , 342 Ill. App. 3d 827, 795 N.E. 2d 924 (1st Dist. 2003); Monroe v. Trinity Hospital – Advocate, 345 Ill. App. 3d 896, 803 N.E. 2d 1002 (1st Dist. 2003); Shaughnessy v. Skender Construction Co., 342 Ill. App. 3d 730, 794 N. E. 2d 937 ( 1st Dist. 2003 ); Stancle v. Chicago Housing Authority , 2004 WL 444560 (N.D. Ill. 2004); Wallace v. Chicago Housing Authority , 321 F. Supp. 2d 968 (N.D. Ill. 2004); Agnew v. Shaw , 355 Ill. App. 3d 981, 823 N.E. 2d 1046 (1st Dist. 2005); Coburn v. Daimler Chrysler Services of North America , LLC, 2005 WL 736657 (N.D. Ill. 2005)

 

© 2006 the gloor law group. This web site was created by Grip Design on the FirmWise platform